CLEARWATER, Fla. - IndianaStop -- The Florida chapter of the Citizens Commission on Human Rights (CCHR) is intensifying its call for a total ban on electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), also known as electroshock, following the release of a landmark international survey documenting widespread patient harm and systematic violations of informed consent.

Psychiatrists prescribe ECT for approximately 100,000 people a year in the U.S. alone, yet the treatment's actual safety and long-term effectiveness remain unproven by rigorous clinical trials. The procedure involves sending up to 460 volts of electricity through a person's brain to induce a grand mal seizure—effects similar to those where the body stiffens, arms and legs often jerk, and the individual loses consciousness.

New International Survey Reveals Alarming Findings

A 2025 survey published in the Journal of Medical Ethics—the largest of its kind with 1,144 ECT recipients and family members across 37 countries—found that the medical benefits of ECT are routinely exaggerated while risks are systematically downplayed:

• 61% to 84% of ECT recipients reported memory loss, with more than half saying the loss lasted longer than three years
• 59% of recipients said they were not adequately informed before the procedure
• Patients were nearly 4 times more likely to recall being told about temporary memory problems than permanent memory loss
• Patients were 6 times more likely to recall being told ECT can be "life-saving" than about potential heart problems
• 87% reported difficulty with losing their train of thought after treatment
• 86% reported difficulty concentrating
• 78% reported difficulty reading

"The findings confirm what CCHR has documented for decades: patients are being misled about the risks of electroshock," said Diane Stein, president of CCHR Florida. "When nearly 60% of patients say they weren't adequately informed, this isn't an informed consent problem—it's a failure of the entire system."

More on indianastop.com

• Impact Futures Group expands through acquisition of specialist healthcare sector training provider Caring for Care
• FeedSocially - Post Once, Publish Everywhere
• James D. Harding Promoted to Century Fasteners Corp. – Managing Director
• Finland's New Gambling Watchdog Handed Sweeping Powers to Revoke Licenses and Block Illegal Casino Sites
• Powering the AI, Defense and Aerospace Future with Energy Infrastructure and Digital Asset Strength: KULR Technology Group, Inc. $KULR

WHO and UN Call for ECT Ban on Children

In 2023, the World Health Organization and United Nations jointly stated that ECT "is not recommended for children, and this should be prohibited through legislation." The guidance also confirmed that anyone offered ECT must be made aware of all risks, including memory loss and brain damage.

CCHR International addressed the UN Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities in August 2025, urging the global abolition of ECT, forced drugging, and other coercive psychiatric practices—especially when used on children. The Committee acknowledged CCHR's evidence and concerns in its session press release.

Despite these international recommendations, children as young as five can still receive electroshock in the United States, with both the American Psychiatric Association and the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry supporting its use in minors.

Florida Children Remain Unprotected

Florida currently has no age restrictions on ECT use. Public records requests revealed that children in the under-5 age group have received electroshock treatment in several U.S. states. A bipartisan effort in the 2024 Florida legislative session (SB 252/HB 1227) sought to ban ECT on minors under 18, but the legislation did not pass.

"Florida should follow the lead of states like California and Texas that have enacted age restrictions," said Stein. "But we shouldn't stop there. The evidence shows ECT is harmful at any age."

Ireland announced in November 2025 that it is moving to ban ECT on all individuals under 18 through amendments to its mental health legislation.

Lack of FDA Clinical Trials

While proponents claim modern ECT is safer than past versions, the FDA has never required manufacturers to conduct clinical trials proving safety and effectiveness. In December 2018, the FDA reclassified ECT devices from Class III to Class II for limited uses—including for patients as young as 13—despite thousands of public comments opposing the reclassification.

"ECT devices were 'grandfathered' in without going through the rigorous testing required of other medical devices," Stein noted. "The FDA's own advisory panels received testimony about adverse effects including brain damage, cognitive impairment, and death, yet the devices remain on the market."

More on indianastop.com

• $10 Price Target in Think Equity Report Supported by Inventory Financing Floorplan Boot to $60 Million for 2026 Sales Growth in Pre-Owned Boats: $OTH
• Poolvillas Expands Local Presence on the Costa Blanca with New Offices in Moraira and Denia – Over 30 Years of Expertise Now Even Closer to Guests
• City of Bloomington Seeks Residents to Serve on Boards and Commissions
• Radarsign Redefines Crosswalk Safety with Launch of CrossCommand™ RRFB Crosswalk
• OpenSSL Corporation Opens 2026 Advisory Committees' Elections: Shape the Future!

A 2023 Florida jury found ECT device manufacturer Somatics had failed to warn patients about known risks—a landmark case highlighting the legal implications of inadequate informed consent.

Forced Electroshock Continues

The practice of forced ECT remains a reality. In 2021, a Florida man named Brian Henley was forcibly shocked at UF Health Shands Psychiatric Hospital after attempting to refuse treatment. MindFreedom International launched a "Shield Alert" campaign on his behalf, and Henley reported lasting memory loss, confusion, nerve pain, and depression.

A July 2025 Federal Reserve Bank of New York study found that individuals involuntarily hospitalized were nearly twice as likely to die by suicide or overdose within three months of discharge, raising serious questions about the safety of coercive psychiatric interventions.

CCHR's Legislative Track Record

CCHR has been at the forefront of legislative efforts to protect patients from ECT abuse for over five decades:

• California (1976): First U.S. ban on ECT for children under 12
• Texas (1993): Ban on ECT for those under 16
• Western Australia (2014): Prohibition for children under 14, with criminal penalties
• Australian Capital Territory (2015): Ban on ECT for children under 12

"CCHR will continue working with legislators to pass meaningful protections," said Stein. "But the ultimate goal is a total ban on ECT. Decades of evidence show this treatment causes more harm than good."

CCHR's Call to Action

CCHR urges:

1. FDA Action: Remove ECT devices from the market
2. Insurance Reform: Medicaid, Medicare, Tricare, and private insurers should stop coverage for ECT
3. National Ban: States should follow international guidance and move toward eliminating electroshock entirely

"Electroshock, psychosurgery, forced drugging, seclusion, and restraint are not care—they are sanctioned abuse and must end," said Jan Eastgate, President of CCHR International, in her August 2025 UN testimony. "Upholding a person's autonomy, dignity, and liberty is non-negotiable."

About CCHR: The Citizens Commission on Human Rights was co-founded in 1969 by the Church of Scientology and renowned psychiatrist Dr. Thomas Szasz to investigate and expose psychiatric abuses. With chapters across six continents, CCHR has been instrumental in obtaining more than 190 laws worldwide to protect individuals from harmful psychiatric practices. The Florida chapter of CCHR is an award-winning nonprofit recognized for its work in mental health human rights and government relations. L. Ron Hubbard, founder of Scientology, first brought psychiatric imprisonment to wide public notice: "Thousands and thousands are seized without process of law, every week, over the 'free world' tortured, castrated, killed. All in the name of 'mental health,'" he wrote in March 1969.